Frequently, LCD televisions are cited for not having the same great black levels as plasma TVs, but we've seen manufacturers able to leap that hurdle in recent times, though the best performance is frequently limited to their most expensive models. The Vizio SV470XVT1A was not able to achieve the deep blacks of its competitors, as evinced in the chart below. It's certainly not as attractive as some of the ultra-thin TVs, nor does it share their slim profile, but that's what you should expect for this price. The Vizio SV470XVT1A is not a 'beautiful' TV, per se, but it can blend in nicely with the background of your living room. The Vizio SV470XVT1A ships with an instruction manual, remote control, batteries, cleaning cloth, and an HDMI cable to get you started. Our only complaint is that the target range for pointing the remote at the TV is incredibly narrow. This image was created using the imagemagick command of magick compare Original.jpg converted.jpg x.The remote control for the Vizio SV470XVT1A is quite thin and lightweight, with excellent button layout. The differences can be visually similar, but they will grow exponentially each time you re-save the file as jpeg. The red is where the image has been changed from the original. Here's a comparison of your original and the converted file. That's a lot of extra work when you could use exiftool as above to fix the images without damaging them. QuoteI think I may have found a workaround. I removed the default viewer long ago so I can't test it.Įxiftool (-overwrite_Original -ColorSpaceTags=).exeĪnd he can drag/drop to remove the profiles. He can now drag his images onto the exiftool icon and it will re-write the ICC profiles. Rename it asĮxiftool (-overwrite_Original -ColorSpaceTags= -TagsFromFile -ColorSpaceTags).exe Quote from: West Swan on October 21, 2021, 09:58:32 PM I've attached the resultant file after converting jpg -> bmp -> jpg. ![]() Of course he could just use a different photo viewer but that isn't going to happen anytime this century I'm guessing that saving the jpg as a 24bit bmp removes the ICC profile which means Windows Photo Viewer can open it? The quality of the image doesn't seem to be affected (at least to his and my eyes). He said of course I can save the bloody photo twice. I just tested all that and it works and Dad is happy to do it. That increases the size of the image (in megabytes) quite significantly so if Dad wants he can open the bmp in Microsoft Paint and save it to a jpg image again. From there I save the jpg as a 24bit bmp image which Windows Photo Viewer can open. I can open those jpg files in Microsoft Paint. Unfortunately that wouldn't be feasible as, even if I could work out how to do it, it would mean I had to "fix" any photos he took by logging in remotely. Happy to provide any further information required. Would there be a way of getting Windows Photo Viewer to open these jpg files without removing the ICC Profile? Windows Photo Viewer will now open the photo and Dad is happy with the colours etc.īuuuuttttt I don't want to have to do this for every photo he takes for the next decade I've managed to find a way to get Windows Photo Viewer to open the jpg for him by using ExifTool and the GUI to remove the ICC Profile. Other photo viewers will but Dad loves the simplicity of Windows Photo Viewer and hates all the others.ĭoing a bit of research (please correct me if I'm wrong) I found that the problem is that Windows Photo Viewer doesn't understand the ICC Profile in the jpg file. Ok the issue is that when Dad emails photo's to himself from his Oppo CPH1969 F11 Pro Windows Photo Viewer will not open them. Thank you to Bogdan Hrastnik for making one. ![]() Having said that in order to work on this problem I had to use a GUI for ExifTool. ![]() I wouldn't have a clue about photography but can work my way around a computer quite easily. He isn't that good with computers though. My Dad is a keen photographer for many years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |